MENU:

CounterAct passes the test!

CounterAct's extensive laboratory testing:

CounterAct's electrostatic corrosion protection systems have undergone continuous development using field evaluation in the harshest of environments and controlled laboratory tests (since 1987) that have shown our system and process to be effective in reducing the spread of corrosion by as much as 80% on automotive grade steel test panels.

But...

a product's testing claims are only as good as three factors:

1. Is the testing applicable to real world situations?

(CounterAct Corrosion Protection utilizes on going field evaluations to supplement our lab results.)

2. Is the testing agency reliable and reputable?

(CounterAct Corrosion Protection uses recognized facilities familiar with standardized corrosion testing methods and apparatus.

3. Can the test be repeated for verification purposes? (CounterAct Corrosion Protection has employed not just one testing facility, but numerous internationally recognized facilities and ASTM standardized tests.)

A Sample of Our Evaluators:

Respected Independent

Laboratory Testing:

                     LACOR Corrosion Laboratory(UFRGS)

                     Porto Alegre, Brazil, 12-9-1987

                     Stds: ASTM D 1654



             American Analytical Laboratories

     Akron, OH 44311, 4-11-1990

Kent State University

Kent, OH 44242, 6-28-1990

Queensland University of Technology

             Brisbane, QLD, Australia 4001

             5-5-1995

             Laboratory Report # HC1213

                ETL Testing Laboratories

             Div. of Inchcape Testing

             Cortland, New York 13045,

             4-9-1995

             Certified Test Report No. 561472

             Stds: ASTM D1654

             EMC Services Pty. Ltd

             Certified Test Report: # 91051

             Stds: Aus/NZ 4251.1      11-2-1999



What does CounterAct's testing show?

We are often asked: "Why has CounterAct conducted so many different tests on its electronic rust protection devices?"

CounterAct Corrosion Protection has conducted and continues to conduct a vigorous testing program of both laboratory and field testing to demonstrate and verify our electronic rust protection system's effectiveness. The above listings are merely a representative sampling of the testing CounterAct has conducted on three continents according to a logical and rational process that serves to demonstrate both to the trained scientist and the average person how CounterAct electronic rust protection works and the practicality and effectiveness of the CounterAct electronic rust protection method.

The Kent State and American Analytical Labs tests were conducted to demonstrate that our capacitive coupling method produces an electrostatic charge on the metal body to which it is applied and an alteration in the surface charge on the metal body's surface. In other words this testing illustrated how the CounterAct electronic rust protection method is a demonstrable and measurable effect that can be monitored by the scientific method.

The Queensland University of Technology test was conducted to demonstrate that our capacitive coupling method produced an electrostatic charge on the entire surface of a metal automobile body to which it was applied and an alteration in the surface charge on the automobile's metal body surface even at a distance from the capacitive coupler. (Note: In our electronic rust protection method our capacitive coupler behaves like the positive half of a capacitor.)

The Queensland University of Technology test demonstrated that the CounterAct electronic rust protection effect was measurable over the complete surface of a typical automobile's body by routine scientific methods.

The LACOR and INCHCAPE/ETL tests were conducted to ASTM standard D 1654 to demonstrate that our capacitive coupling method produced a reduction in the rate of corrosion in uniformly scribed and painted automotive grade steel panels in a controlled environmental humidity chamber. (100% humidity, 100 degrees F).

(It is important to note that this was not an immersion test with the steel panels submerged in a tank nor a "salt spray" test. Such tests are often employed for traditional impressed current cathodic protection devices but have no applicability to the reduction of corrosion in motor vehicles or open air structures unless one plans on parking a car at the bottom of a swimming pool! Under such conditions an ordinary flashlight battery could be made to produce a traditional impressed current cathodic protection effect and reduce the corrosion process. Under real world conditions in a open air, non-submerged environment at the Earth's surface, such as what CounterAct's controlled environmental heat and humidity chamber testing mimics, impressed current cathodic protection proves ineffective )

Our tests have shown that under laboratory conditions a greater than 80% reduction in the corrosion rate can be produced by CounterAct electronic rust protection devices.

CounterAct Corrosion Protection's Professional Affiliations and Accreditations:

Member: Manufacturer's Association of NW. PA.

Member: SEMA (Specialty Equipment Market Association.)

Member: NACE (National Association. of Corrosion Engineers)